Your First Home: a Help to Buy scheme model with 2.5% deposits, and developers may pay towards it
Construction Enquirer reports a 2.5% deposit and an equity loan of up to 20% for first-time buyers of new builds in England. Developers would be expected to pay towards it, with the detail due at the Budget.
First-time buyers in England could get into a new-build home with a 2.5% deposit and a government equity loan worth up to 20% of the price, Construction Enquirer reported on 28 September 2026. The scheme is called Your First Home, and there is no start date yet: Construction Enquirer says the launch timetable will be set out at the Budget on 28 October.
Construction Enquirer describes it as a return to a model similar to the old Help to Buy scheme equity loan, not the old programme coming back. That scheme backed 387,195 purchases in England between April 2013 and May 2023, Construction Enquirer reports, with equity loans totalling £24.7bn. Those figures belong to the old scheme, not to the budget for the new one.
The money goes to buyers, not to your business, so there is nothing here among the grants and schemes you could claim yourself. If you work for developers rather than sell homes, any benefit would come through new-home sales, and nobody has put a number on extra contracts.

Who qualifies for the Help to Buy style loans is still blank
The detail is due at the Budget, Construction Enquirer says, including household income limits and regional property price caps. Until then there is no launch date, no word on how long the loan stays interest-free and nothing on what the buyer pays after that.
Those caps decide which of your buyers, and which of your homes, could qualify. Construction Products Association economics director Noble Francis warned, in the same Construction Enquirer report, that viability remained a major constraint in lower-value housing markets. He said the scheme’s impact would depend heavily on the price caps and income thresholds. If you build where house prices are lower, that is the line to watch.
What developers could pay is not yet known
Developers who join would be expected to contribute towards the programme’s costs, according to Construction Enquirer. How much, how it is collected and whether it is optional are all still blank.
So you can’t put a figure on it yet, the same way you can’t with building control fees under the reform plan. It would sit in your numbers alongside any building safety levy liability on the same homes. Leave a line for it and don’t price it.
A scheme that helps a buyer through the door can still add a cost for the developer. Both can be true on the same plot.
The Home Builders Federation wants it rolled out quickly. Its chief executive Neil Jefferson said the scheme needed to work for builders of all sizes and across different parts of the country, Construction Enquirer reports. That is a request from the industry, not a promise, and the terms for joining are still to come.
Until a developer puts a job and a start date in writing, keep your team where the work is. The detail lands at the Budget.
Trade resources for tradespeople, straight to your inbox.
Occasionally we will send you a newsletter. Free, unsubscribe in one click.
Keep reading
TrustMark consultation could make it the single route for customer complaints
PHPI reports that TrustMark wants to become the single point of contact when your customers complain, and is seeking views before it decides. It would also clarify what registered businesses are responsible for. These are proposals, not new obligations.
BS 7671 Amendment 4 is now the only current version: live jobs depend on the contract, ECN reports
From 15 October, new installations must follow BS 7671 Amendment 4, Electrical Contracting News reports. Citing SELECT, it says a job designed to the old version may be finished to it if the contract allows. Of the forms, the EICR changes most.
Cladding remediation bill reaches Parliament: contractors who paid could chase the manufacturer
A bill introduced on 14 October would make freeholders and others responsible for building safety fix unsafe cladding without delay, with fines of up to £500,000 for ignoring a Remediation Order. Contractors who have already paid for the work would get a simpler claim against the manufacturer.